|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
© Copyright 2012 DigitalCameraInfo.com, all rights reserved. All trademarks and product names are property of their respective owners. DigitalCameraInfo.com makes no guarantees regarding any of the advice offered on this web site or by its staff or users. All user comments and postings are not the responsibility of DigitalCameraInfo.com. |
best image quality for the money - even at 3 yrs old
Strengths: Excellent image quality, even at high sensitivity (ISO) settings.
Weakness: No built-in flash. Lacking in the latest features like Live view and dust removal. Also a little too big and heavy. Even though Canon lenses are generally the best, they are not good enough.
It beats my 1Dmk2 for ease of getting good image quality. And I just tested it against a Nikon D300, which it also beats. Image quality is so good that it can produce excellent quality full-page magazine ads at ISO 3200 (with appropriate lighting and focus)!
I prefer the 5D in every way, over my 1Ds2, except that the 5D does not have voice memo, which is a MAJOR omission by Canon for a pro who does mainly travel photography.
Also, its speed and buffer are big/fast enough to photograph little kids.
Good camera, and best image quality for the buck. But now it needs to be updated with GPS stamp, live view, voice memo, dust removal, ISO 25000, IR remote w/mirror lockup, dual media slots, built-in flash, etc.
Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?